the further strengthening of the “Environment for Europe” process and to the results of the Fourth Ministerial Conference in Aarhus, Denmark, in June Convenzione per l’accesso alle informazioni, alla partecipazione e alla giustizia ambientale (Convenzione di Aarhus). ispra › Anno › Novembre › Aperta la consultazione pubblica sul quarto rapporto di aggiornamento sull’attuazione della Convenzione di Aarhus in Italia.
|Published (Last):||26 April 2013|
|PDF File Size:||12.77 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.99 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It entered into force on 30 October As of Marchit has 47 parties—46 states and the European Union. Liechtenstein and Monaco have signed the convention but have not ratified it. The Aarhus Convention grants the public rights regarding access to information, public participation aarhys access to justice, in governmental decision-making processes on matters concerning the local, national and transboundary environment.
It focuses on interactions between the public and public authorities. The Aarhus Convention is a multilateral environmental agreement through which the opportunities for citizens to access environmental information are increased and transparent and reliable regulation procedure is secured.
Among the latter is included the ECwho therefore has the task to ensure compliance not only within the member States but also for its cnovenzione, all those bodies who carry out public administrative duties.
The Aarhus Convention is a rights-based approach: A distinction is made between “the public”, all the civil society’s actors, and the “public concerned” precisely, those persons or organisations affected or interested in environmental decision-making e.
The private sector, for which information disclosure depends on voluntary, non- mandatory practices, and bodies acting in a judicial or legislative capacity, are excluded.
Other significant provisions are the “non-discrimination” principle all the information has to be provided without taking account of the nationality or citizenship of the applicantthe international nature of the convention,   and the importance attributed to the promotion of environmental education of the public. The Aarhus convention is a “proceduralisation of the environmental regulation”,   it focuses more on convenzoone and listing procedures rather than conevnzione standards and specifying outcomes, permitting the parties involved to interpret and implement the convention on the systems and circumstances that characterize their nation.
This model embodies a perfect example of a multi-level governance. The risk could lay in a loss of time and resources that could be otherwise invested in defining the outcomes,  notwithstanding the fact that it renders the convention vague, weak and open to multiple interpretations. The relative differences between the participants and social groups’ resource inequalities also suggests the possibility for irregular and imbalanced environmental protection.
The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee was established to fulfill the requirement of Article 15 of the Convention on review of compliance to establish arrangements for reviewing compliance with the Convention. The Compliance mechanism is unique in international environmental law, as it allows members aahus the public to communicate concerns about a Party’s compliance directly to a committee of international legal experts empowered to examine the merits of the case the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee.
Nonetheless, the Compliance Committee cannot issue binding decisions, but rather makes recommendations to the full Meeting of the Parties MoP.
Aarhus Convention – Wikipedia
However, in practise, as MoPs occur infrequently, Parties attempt to comply with the recommendations of the Compliance Committee. As of August41 communication from the public — many originating with non-governmental organizations — and one submission from a Party had been lodged with the Convention’s Compliance Committee.
As of May34 states plus the European Union have ratified the Protocol. PRTRs are inventories of pollution from industrial sites and other sources such as agriculture and transport. The objective of the Protocol is “to enhance public access to information through the establishment of coherent, nationwide pollutant release and transfer registers PRTRs.
Parties to the Protocol need not be Parties to the Convention.
The Protocol is in this sense a free-standing, international d. As of Augustit had been ratified by 21 countries. The GMO amendment will enter into force 90 days after at least three-quarters of the Parties to the Aarhus Convention ratify it. It is by far the most impressive elaboration of principle 10 of the Rio Declarationwhich stresses the need for citizens’ participation in environmental issues and for access to information on the environment held by public authorities.
As such it is the most ambitious venture in the area of environmental democracy so far undertaken under the auspices of the United Nations. The influence of the Convenzoone Convention also coonvenzione beyond the environmental field. At the 2nd Internet Governance Forumheld on 12—15 Mayin Rio de Janeirothe Convention was presented as a model of public participation convenzilne transparency in the operation of international forums.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved 18 August Information disclosure in Global Environmental Governance”. Colorado journal of International Environmental Law and Policy.
Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law.
Review of European Community and International Law. Your right to a healthy environment: Public participation under the Aarhus convention”.
The Modern Law Review. Europe, globalization and sustainable development.
Social and environmental accountability. Environment portal Category Commons Organizations. Retrieved from ” https: Use dmy dates from October Views Read Edit View history.